isisuser.com > forum > isis free / ... > model build > multiple arch ...
Name Password Forgot your password?

Forum topic area

You are in the forum topic » Multiple Arch Bridges

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the forum rules. You need to register and be logged in before you can post. Go to the forum area 'Model build ' or to the 'top level forum'

 

Author
Thread
srakumar
Member

 

Location: 
Registered: 13/01/2009   
Multiple Arch Bridges
What is the best unit to model the multiple arch bridges with different pier widths in between (i.e arch eyes spacing varies) and the shape of the arch changes too i.e smaller arches in the end.

Arch Unit or USBPR unit? Help does not clearly give on when to go for which unit? Any clear guidelines on which unit is more appropriate?

04/11/2009 15:23 Link - Ip: Logged - Quote:
adamsk
Member

 

Location: 
Registered: 13/01/2009    Warnings: 0
Hi Sravan,
My rule of thumb is: small, arched bridges - use ARCH; large, flat bridges - use USBPR. This is largely based on the research that was used to derive the formulae - the ARCH unit came from the HR "Afflux at Arch Bridges" report, based on UK bridges; the USBPR came from the US Bureau of Public Roads and mainly concerned typical US road bridges.
Others may have more practical reasons for choosing their preference.
NB USBPR does have the facility to model pier effects specifically.
Konrad
05/11/2009 09:44 Link - Ip: Logged - Quote:
srakumar
Member

 

Location: 
Registered: 13/01/2009    Warnings: 0
Konrad,

Thanks. It was a specific issue for the multiple arch bridges. Some times the no of arches are upto 10 in some old bridges.Choice of unit is not clear in the ISIS help. Any more light?

Sravan
09/11/2009 11:44 Link - Ip: Logged - Quote:
MattH
Member

 

Location: 
Registered: 13/01/2009    Warnings: 0
Sravan

The recommendation is that a for a single arch bridge unit representing multiple arches, the arches must act as a single unit - i.e. have similar velocities and water levels.

If the arches are very different sizes, then a better approach is to model as multiple units. As an example, I've modelled bridges with a number of arches in the channel as one unit, and the smaller flood relief arches on the floodplain as another arch bridge unit in parallel.

It's a matter of judgement how many units are needed, based on how you expect the hydraulics to behave.

Hope this helps

Matt
__________________
Specialist Modeller
Halcrow
18/11/2009 09:56 Link - Ip: Logged - Quote:

 
Quick reply
You need to login before you can post.
If you are not registered on the site, register here.

Latest forum posts

» increasing dflood causes ...
» ISIS Mapper for TUFLOW ...
» Blockage unit
» Back flow at downstream ...
» ISIS v3.4 - Images not ...
» Importing Survey/Cross ...
» Importing Survey/Cross ...
» Blockage
» Orifice Linearisation ...
» ISIS Version 3.4 Beta

Quick search

Quick search
Search term:
Any word
All words
Phrase

Need the advanced search?

RSS Forum Feed

Active users: 0 | Guests: 9

No registered users are logged in

We would like to welcome our newest member: HAFIZAZLI